Selective breeding in organic dairy farming

Tuesday June 2, Wytze Nauta will defend his PhD-thesis ‘Selective Breeding in Organic Dairy Production’. 

Family herd

A family herd

Organic dairy farming doesn’t have a distinct breeding system. Farmers are free to breed with a farm bred bull or Artificial Insemination (AI) bulls of conventional breeding programmes. Organic farming thus directly and indirectly depends on conventional breeding goals and modern selection and reproduction techniques such as multiple ovation and in vitro embryo production and transfer (ET). As naturaless and animal integrity are basic principles of organic farming, the direct and indirect use of these modern reproduction techniques is questioned, from organic farmers as well as from societal interest groups favouring organic farming. Moreover organic farming intends to maintain or even contribute to bio-diversity. It supports the use of different (traditional, regional) breeds. Finally, in organic farming animals are kept for different purposes and in a different, more extensive production environment then conventional agriculture. This further questions the dependency on conventional breeding programmes, since these programmes select breeding animals that perform best in intensive, high input production systems. Practice learns that on the whole these cows are genetically not well equiped to perform in an organic environment and this was sustained by research (see paper Genotype x Enviroment Interaction). So one can argue that organic farming has its own demands towards breeding, that may even differ with different farming strategies (see paper Different Strategies, Different Demands). Organic farming is highly diversified and organic farmers are known for their on-farm experiments, also with regard to breeding.

The question is not so much if selective breeding in organic dairy farming needs to be more in line with the intentions and principles of organic farming, all stakeholders agree on that, but to what extend and how to realize that. Then opinions diverge and different positions are taken (see Discussion paper).

Wytze Nauta explores this question throughout his PhD-thesis. He finally discusses the pro’s and con’s of three options that meet organic principles to a different extend: 1) a pragmatical one, i.e. using conventional breeding programmes, but with the exclusion of modern reproduction techniques, although an exception is made for AI; 2) a distinct organic breeding programme with distinct breeding goals and exclusion of modern breeding techniques and 3) a distinct breeding system based on natural mating.

The more exclusive, the more organic, but also the more difficult to realise. However, for an individual farmer it is more easy to decide to start breeding with a bull at the farm for natural mating. For option one and two more stakeholders need to come to an agreement. But all options imply a ‘system innovation’: radical change of practices at different levels of different actors in different positions lacking appropriate knowledge to come to a well grounded breeding system for organic farming. So, the ultimate recommendation of Wytze Nauta is not to impose a new breeding system, but to start joint learning processes involving organic farmers as well as other stakeholders based on the three options provided. This would best respect diversity organic farming.

Wytze Nauta (w.nauta@louisbolk.nl) is researcher Animal breeding at the Louis Bolk Institute.

Kennis arrangeren voor gebiedsontwikkeling

Binnenkort verschijnt het LEI-rapport  ‘Kennis maken met regionale kennisarrangementen: de werkvloer van een Kennisnetwerk Vitaal Platteland’.

Het doet verslag van een leerzame tocht van de landelijke werkgroep Kennisnetwerk Vitaal Platteland langs beloftevolle kennisarrangementen in de Veenkolonien (Werkplaats), Eemland (Regionaal Innovatie Centrum en Plattelandsacademie) en Westerkwartier (Countryside Exchange). Een werkbezoek aan het Kennisloket in Kempenland werd afgelast, maar het Kennisloket is wel meegenomen in de analyse. De gezamelijke bevindingen zijn omgezet in aanbevelingen richting opdrachtgever Directie Platteland van LNV hoe gebiedsontwikkeling vanuit onderwijs en onderzoek op structurele kan worden ondersteund met raad en daad. Aangezien het rapport is goedgekeurd en de aanbevelingen inmiddels ter hand worden genomen, wil ik als een van de samenstellers van het rapport de Samenvatting alvast breed delen.

Overigens was hier al eerder een artikel (‘Kennis in de regio’) over verschenen in het tijdschrift Landwerk van Ina Horlings, werkzaam bij Telos, die ook aan de werkbezoeken heeft meegedaan en samen met Eelke Wielinga (LEI) en mij het eindrapport heeft samengesteld.

Hieronder volgen vijf passages uit de Samenvatting:

Continue reading

RuDI meeting in Rome

From 22 to 24 of April, the RuDI project held its third project meeting in Rome. The aim of the meeting was to inform each other about the first year of the project, to make a synthesis of key results and to develop case study methodology. Once we have finalized the case study methodology this summer, the next phase of the project will be to conduct 20 case studies for in depth understanding of key practices in the policy process and their potential effects. For example, in the Netherlands, the European Rural Development Plan has been incorporated into a broader process of rural policy change. A key element of this process is the ‘performance contract’ between the national and the provincial authorities in which both levels of government agree on policy priority, investment budgets, co-finance responsibilities and performance indicators. The question is how different RDP Axis are brought into a system of performance contracts and whether these contracts are indeed a stimulus for more integrated rural policy design and delivery

sta71393We also presented our work to the International Expert Group (IEG) which was established for the duration of the project. In Rome, eight experts joined us, coming from a wide range of organisations including the European Commission, the OECD, consultancies and universities. The IEG helped us to reflect upon our first results and to gain new insights. They formulated recommendations for further elaboration. The experts encouraged us to find a qualitative way to analyse the transformative effects and potential impact of the rural development policy process; the ‘forgotten middle’ in current evaluation practices.

Comparing farming in China and Europe

I’m a PhD candidate from China Agricultural University. I have a major in rural development and management. Now I am a visiting researcher at the Rural Sociology Group for one year and I like it very much. Each eduaction period I attend one or two courses.

yong-dsc056362

Chinese farm

Recently, I wrote an article about a Chinese farmer’s note book, with my supervisor prof. Jan Douwe van der Ploeg. I encountered this note book during my field work in Northeast China in July 2008. It’s been nearly three months since we began writing this article. Today, we finally finish the article, both in English and Chinese. In this farmer’s note book, monetary expenses and monetary entrances are all registered in a chronological order. Meanwhile, it also shows some of the networks the farm is embedded in. We also make some comparisons between China and Holland (or Europe). The data show that there is considerable dynamism; they also make clear that basically we are dealing here with a peasant-like way of farming. The article concludes with an overview of the structure of the rural economy in this part of China. I will write more about that in later blogs.

To be honest, I think there are many research experiences in rural sociology we should learn from Wageningen, especially in the field of sociology of farming. At the same time, I mind to consider the differences in social context between Western countries and China. The main problems in rural China we concluded are about “farm, farmer and farming”, which are also the hot research topics in academic field. Take farmer for example: there are about 0.73 billion of people living in rural area, but they don’t have enough land to sustain their livelihood, so many farmers go to urban as migrant workers and leave their family members home. These family members are left-behind population. My college members did a lot research on this group of people. As for my PhD thesis, I focus on applying the social capital theory in the context of rural China. To quote Jan Douwe van der Ploeg: “the theories are not in the air, they are in the people’s everyday life”. I will this mind during my research.

Kracht van koeien – vier ontwerpen voor een duurzame melkveehouderij

Brochure 'Kracht van koeien' Gisteren is het resultaat van het project ‘Kracht van koeien‘ gepresenteerd: een prachtig geillustreerde brochure met vier ontwerpen voor een duurzame melkveehouderij, waarmee zowel de wensen en eisen van de koe, de ondernemer, het milieu als de burger gediend zijn. De ontwerpen zijn gebaseerd op een vernieuwende ontwerp-aanpak voor systeeminnovaties in de veehouderij ontwikkeld door prof.dr.ir. Peter Grootkoerkamp (peter.grootkoerkamp@wur.nl) en dr. Bram Bos (bram.bos@wur.nl)  van Wageningen UR. 

Zo doen de projectleiders in Kracht van Koeien afstand van een traditionele stal voor melkvee. Ze stellen dat het beter is als koeien zelf kunnen kiezen of ze buiten staan of onder een beschutting. Ook maken ze werk van het opvangen van mest en urine. Die komen weer van pas als kunstmestvervanger. ‘In Kracht van Koeien doen we voorstellen voor anders denken en anders doen’, zegt Groot Koerkamp. ‘Ze vormen de basis van de ontwerpen. Let wel: geen van die voorstellen is speciaal ons idee. Allerlei onderzoekers, boeren en andere praktijkmensen zijn er al jaren mee bezig. Wij zetten ze alleen in samenhang om te laten zien dat ze mét elkaar een meervoudige sprong in duurzaamheid bereiken.’